Project Overview
This project analyzed warehouse order and SKU data to identify the operational factors driving most picking activity. By profiling item demand, order composition, and handling patterns, I developed recommendations to improve warehouse layout, reduce travel time, and increase fulfillment efficiency.
The analysis showed that a relatively small percentage of SKUs generated most warehouse activity, providing opportunities to redesign storage locations and streamline picking operations.
Tools
- Microsoft Excel
- Data Analysis
- Pareto Analysis
- Warehouse Profiling
- Supply Chain Analytics
Objectives
The project focused on answering several operational questions:
- Which SKUs generate most picking activity?
- Which products account for most customer demand?
- How complex are customer orders?
- Should the warehouse prioritize full-carton or broken-carton picking?
- Which product families should be stored together?
- What order quantities occur most frequently?
1. Item Activity Profile
Objective
Identify which SKUs generate the majority of warehouse picking activity.
Key Findings
- 1,750 SKUs generated 80% of all picking activity
- These represented only 32.5% of all SKUs

Recommendation
Locate these high-activity SKUs in the most accessible storage locations to reduce travel distance and improve picking efficiency.
2. Demand Profile
Objective
Determine which SKUs account for most customer demand.
Key Findings
- 675 SKUs generated 80% of total demand
- Only 12.54% of all SKUs accounted for most product movement.

Recommendation
Assign high-demand products to locations that simplify replenishment and minimize stockout risk.
3. Lines per Order
Objective
Measure order complexity.
Key Findings
- 57.68% of orders contained only one line
- 39.07% contained only one item

Recommendation
Create a dedicated fast-picking lane for single-line orders to eliminate unnecessary sorting and reduce fulfillment time.
4. Order Quantity Profile
Objective
Determine whether operations should focus on full-carton or broken-carton picking.
Key Findings
- 99.16% Broken-carton picks
- 0.31% Full-carton picks
- 0.54% Mixed picks

Recommendation
Design the warehouse primarily for broken-case picking while maintaining a small area for occasional full-carton orders.
5. Item Family Profile
Objective
Analyze which product families are commonly ordered together.
Key Findings
- Shirts represented 90.25% of single-family orders.

Recommendation
Store shirt SKUs together in high-access locations while positioning frequently paired families nearby.
6. Units of Handling
Objective
Identify the most common order quantities.
Key Findings
Most frequent order quantities were:
- 10 units
- 5 units
- 15 units
- 1 unit

Recommendation
Introduce 5-unit and 10-unit inner packs to reduce counting time and improve picking accuracy.
Overall Recommendations
Based on all warehouse profiles, I recommended:
- Relocating high-activity SKUs to premium picking locations.
- Designing the warehouse primarily for broken-case picking.
- Creating a fast lane for single-line orders.
- Grouping shirt SKUs strategically.
- Introducing inner-pack packaging for common order quantities.
Impact
This project demonstrates how warehouse profiling and Pareto analysis can guide facility layout decisions, reduce travel time, simplify picking operations, and improve overall warehouse productivity.
Skills Demonstrated
- Warehouse Design
- Facility Layout
- Pareto Analysis
- Supply Chain Analytics
- Logistics Engineering
- Process Improvement
- Industrial Engineering